The Founder's Guide to Picking Your Industry: Complexity as Strategy
Why vertical SaaS in complex industries creates defensible moats while horizontal markets breed commoditization.
April 10, 2025 10 min read
Most founders chase big markets. They want the largest possible customer base, the broadest appeal, the cleanest pitch deck TAM slide.
They're leaving money on the table.
The data tells a different story. Vertical SaaS companies targeting narrow, complex industries achieve 15% EBITDA margins. Horizontal players doing "software for everyone" hit 6%. That's not a rounding error. That's a 2.5x difference in profitability on the same revenue.
The conventional wisdom about picking industries is backwards. Bigger isn't better. Simpler isn't faster. Complex industries with high barriers to entry create the exact conditions for sustainable competitive advantage.
The Profitability Paradox
Vertical SaaS companies spend 17% of revenue on sales and marketing. Horizontal vendors spend 34%.
Think about that. Vertical players capture higher margins while spending half as much on customer acquisition. The math doesn't just work better. It works exponentially better.
Why the difference exists:
Domain expertise acts as qualification - customers self-select based on industry fit
Narrower positioning reduces noise - you're not competing with every horizontal tool
Word-of-mouth spreads faster - tight-knit industries talk to each other
Sales cycles shorten - "built for healthcare" beats "built for everyone" every time
When you build for everyone, you differentiate for no one. Your marketing budget fights against every generic business tool. Your sales team explains why you're different from 47 competitors who all look identical.
Vertical SaaS flips this dynamic. The complexity becomes the filter.
Category leaders in vertical SaaS capture 40-60% market share while commanding 30-50% pricing premiums. But they don't eliminate competition. Multiple viable players exist because different customer segments value different trade-offs.
This is better than winner-take-all. You don't need to be the biggest to win. You need to be the best for your specific segment.
The sustainability advantage:
Niche positioning allows premium pricing without triggering winner-take-all competition
Multiple players can profitably coexist serving different customer tiers
Later entrants can still build viable businesses by targeting underserved segments
Market leaders maintain pricing power without becoming targets for disruption
This market structure creates long-term stability. You're not in an arms race to monopoly. You're building a profitable business in a sustainable market.
The Dual Protection Moat
Vertical SaaS benefits from asymmetric defense.
Horizontal players can't justify vertical-specific investment when they're serving 20 industries. Building deep construction ERP functionality doesn't make sense when construction is 5% of your customer base.
New vertical entrants face established relationships, proven implementations, and integration ecosystems that took years to build. Your first healthcare compliance customer took 18 months to close. Your competitor's first customer will take just as long.
This creates compound protection:
Horizontal competitors can't compete on features - your vertical depth beats their horizontal breadth
Vertical competitors can't compete on maturity - your installed base and integrations take years to replicate
Switching costs accumulate - data migration, staff retraining, and process redesign average $500k+ for mid-market customers
Each implementation deepens expertise - you learn from every customer, compounding your advantage
The beauty of vertical SaaS is that both threats (horizontal competition and new vertical entrants) neutralize each other. You win by being in the middle.
Complexity as Competitive Advantage
Software development complexity protects vertical SaaS businesses from competitive threats while justifying premium pricing.
Digitizing specific industry functions is hard. Really hard. You need to understand workflows, regulations, edge cases, and tribal knowledge that takes years to accumulate. Most teams can't or won't make that investment.
That difficulty is your moat:
Domain expertise takes years to develop - you can't hire it, you have to build it
Regulatory knowledge creates barriers - getting healthcare compliance right requires deep specialization
Industry-specific integrations multiply value - each connection increases switching costs
Workflow embeddedness locks in customers - once you're in the daily workflow, displacement becomes expensive
As you can see in our MVP development guide, building software is hard. Building vertical software is harder. That's exactly why it works.
The horizontal SaaS market matured by 2020. Large competitors and commoditized offerings saturated every business function. New entrants in horizontal SaaS compete on price because they can't differentiate on features.
Vertical SaaS inverts this dynamic. Complexity increases differentiation.
Picking the Right Complex Industry
Not all complexity is created equal. Some industries have structural advantages that make them better targets for vertical SaaS.
Look for these characteristics:
High regulatory burden - industries with compliance requirements create natural barriers to entry
Fragmented market - thousands of potential customers rather than a handful of enterprises
Outdated existing tools - legacy software creates greenfield opportunities for modern solutions
Strong industry associations - word-of-mouth spreads faster in connected communities
Recurring workflows - daily or weekly usage patterns drive retention
Healthcare checks every box. So does construction, legal services, property management, and dozens of other industries where the incumbent software was built in the 1990s and nobody's bothered to rebuild it.
Red flags to avoid:
Rapidly commoditizing industries - if horizontal tools are "good enough," vertical positioning won't save you
Tiny addressable markets - even with high prices, you need enough customers to build a business
Declining industries - vertical expertise in a dying market is still a dying market
When evaluating how to prioritize features for your MVP, industry complexity should inform your roadmap. The features that require deep domain expertise are the ones competitors can't easily copy.
The Technology Barrier Becomes an Asset
Most startup advice tells you to reduce complexity. Pick the simplest tech stack. Ship the easiest features. Get to market faster.
For vertical SaaS, this advice is wrong.
Technology complexity in service of industry-specific functionality creates defensible advantages. The difficulty of building comprehensive construction project management software is exactly what prevents horizontal project management tools from competing.
Strategic use of complexity:
Deep integrations with industry tools require technical investment competitors won't match
Industry-specific data models reflect years of learning that can't be copied
Regulatory compliance features demand expertise that takes time to accumulate
Workflow customization for vertical use cases creates stickiness
Starting a technology-based business in a complex industry increases the uphill battle. That's the point. The steeper the climb, the fewer competitors make it to the top.
Partnering with tech experts or established companies can help overcome initial barriers. But the knowledge you build through customer implementations becomes proprietary. Nobody can replicate your vertical expertise once you've accumulated it through dozens of real-world deployments.
Founders optimize for the wrong metric when they chase market size over market profitability. A $500M vertical market with 15% margins produces better returns than a $5B horizontal market with 6% margins if you can capture reasonable share.
The profitability math:
10% of a $500M market = $50M revenue at 15% margin = $7.5M EBITDA
2% of a $5B market = $100M revenue at 6% margin = $6M EBITDA
The horizontal player needs to be 5x more capital-efficient to generate comparable profits. They won't be. They'll spend 34% on sales and marketing while you spend 17%. They'll compete on price while you command premiums.
Vertical markets create better businesses even when the market is smaller.
The Hybrid Model Advantage
Pure vertical SaaS locks you into one industry. Pure horizontal SaaS commoditizes your offering.
The emerging pattern is the hybrid model: vertical depth with horizontal expansion potential.
Companies adopting hybrid approaches boost median ARR growth to around 21%. They maintain vertical expertise in their core market while identifying horizontal features that work across industries.
How hybrid models work:
Start vertical - build deep expertise in one industry to establish product-market fit
Extract horizontal patterns - identify workflows that apply across multiple verticals
Expand strategically - enter adjacent industries where your vertical knowledge transfers
Maintain pricing power - vertical features command premiums while horizontal features drive volume
This approach combines the profitability of vertical SaaS with the growth potential of horizontal expansion. You're not choosing between depth and breadth. You're sequencing them correctly.
As covered in our comparison of in-house and outsourcing development, building vertical expertise often requires specialized development talent. The hybrid model lets you amortize that investment across multiple industries over time.
Network Effects in Vertical Markets
Network effects in horizontal consumer markets create winner-take-all dynamics. More users = more value = more users.
Network effects in vertical markets work differently. The value comes from ecosystem depth, not user scale.
Vertical network effects:
Industry-specific integrations multiply as your install base grows
Data network effects emerge from aggregated industry benchmarks
Marketplace dynamics connect buyers and sellers within your vertical
Knowledge sharing between customers in the same industry creates community value
These effects strengthen over time but don't prevent competition. Multiple platforms can coexist because different customer segments value different features.
The network effects create pricing power. Customers pay premiums for platforms with rich integration ecosystems and deep industry data. But those premiums fund sustainable businesses rather than requiring monopoly dynamics.
Switching Costs That Actually Stick
Most SaaS companies claim high switching costs. Few actually have them.
Vertical SaaS creates real switching costs through workflow embeddedness. When your software becomes the operational backbone for industry-specific processes, displacement becomes prohibitively expensive.
Sources of switching costs:
Data migration complexity - industry-specific data models don't map cleanly to competitors
Process redesign - changing tools means changing industry-standard processes
Integration dependencies - replacing one tool breaks connections to a dozen others
These costs can exceed $500,000 for mid-market customers. That's not "soft" switching costs from user familiarity. That's hard economic costs from disrupting core operations.
The true cost of MVP development includes building these switching costs into your product from day one. They're not features you add later. They're architectural decisions you make early.
When to Choose Complexity
Not every founder should choose complex industries. The strategy works best when you have unfair advantages in a specific vertical.
You're well-positioned for vertical SaaS when:
You have deep industry expertise from years working in the space
You understand regulatory requirements better than generalist engineers would
You have access to initial customers through industry relationships
You're willing to spend years becoming the category expert
You enjoy learning industry minutiae that others find boring
Complexity as strategy only works when you're genuinely interested in the complexity. If you're forcing yourself to care about construction workflows or healthcare compliance, pick a different industry.
The best vertical SaaS founders were industry insiders who got frustrated with existing tools. Their domain expertise becomes their competitive advantage.
The Investor Perspective Shift
Investors moved from horizontal to vertical SaaS opportunities after 2020 when the horizontal market matured. The pattern recognition shifted from "how big is your TAM" to "how defensible is your position."
Vertical SaaS gets funded based on:
Demonstrated domain expertise on the founding team
Early customer validation from industry participants
Clear competitive moats from complexity and switching costs
Path to profitability through premium pricing and efficient CAC
You don't need a $50B TAM slide. You need proof that you understand your vertical better than anyone else and that complexity creates defensible advantages.
As outlined in understanding MVP in agile development, vertical SaaS MVPs focus on depth over breadth. You're not building features for everyone. You're building the exact right features for one industry.
Making the Industry Choice
The framework for picking your industry comes down to three questions:
1. Do you have unfair advantages in this vertical?
Domain expertise, industry relationships, or personal experience that competitors can't easily replicate.
2. Does complexity create defensible moats?
Regulatory requirements, industry-specific workflows, or technical challenges that prevent commoditization.
3. Can you build a profitable business at realistic market share?
Revenue potential, pricing power, and customer acquisition costs that support sustainable unit economics.
If you answer yes to all three, complexity becomes your strategy rather than your obstacle.
The horizontal SaaS era is over. The vertical SaaS opportunity is just beginning. Pick the complex industry where you have unfair advantages, embrace the difficulty, and let the barriers to entry become your competitive moat.
Ready to build vertical SaaS in a complex industry? Work with NextBuild to turn industry expertise into defensible products that command premium pricing while competitors struggle to compete on breadth.
A practical comparison of Cursor and Codeium (Windsurf) AI coding assistants for startup teams, with recommendations based on budget and IDE preferences.
